vivo X300 Pro vs OPPO Find X9 Ultra: Side by Side Specs Comparison

This is a side-by-side smartphone specs comparison of the vivo X300 Pro and OPPO Find X9 Ultra.

The vivo X300 Pro has a 6.78-inch display, MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (3 nm) processor, triple cameras, 5G connectivity, and 6510mAh battery.

Meanwhile, the OPPO Find X9 Ultra has a 6.82-inch display, Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) processor, quad cameras, 5G connectivity, and 7050mAh battery.

Specs vivo X300 Pro OPPO Find X9 Ultra
Picture vivo X300 Pro
3.7/5 stars (14 ratings)
× OPPO Find X9 Ultra
3.7/5 stars (14 ratings)
Screen 6.78-inch FHD+ LTPO AMOLED Display (1260 x 2800 Pixels 452 ppi) with Armor Glass, 1-120Hz Adaptive Refresh Rate, 4500nits peak brightness, Dolby Vision, HDR10+ and punch-hole 6.82-inch QHD+ AMOLED Display (1440 x 3168 Pixels, 510 ppi) with Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, 1-144Hz Refresh Rate, 1-800nits typical brightness, 3600nits peak, Dolby Vision, and punch-hole
OS Android 16 with OriginOS 6 Android 16 with ColorOS 16.0
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (3 nm) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm)
CPU Octa Core CPU
1x C1-Ultra @ 4.21GHz , 3x C1-Premium @ 3.5GHz & 4x C1-Pro @ 2.7GHz
Octa Core CPU
2x Oryon Gen 3 Prime @ 4.61GHz & 6x Oryon Gen 3 Performance @ 3.63GHz
GPU Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 Adreno 840
RAM 16 GB 12 GB
Rear Camera Triple Cameras:
50MP Main Camera (Sony LYT-828, f/1.57 Aperture, Laser Autofocus, OIS)
50MP Ultrawide (f/2.0 Aperture, 119˚ FoV, Autofocus)
200MP Periscope Telephoto (Apochromatic, f/2.67 Aperture, Autofocus, 3.7x Optical zoom, OIS)
-Triple LED Flash
-Up to 8K@30fps or 4K@120fps video recording, OIS/EIS video stabilization, Dolby Vision, 10-bit Log, Color Spectrum Sensor, ZEISS Optics, ZIESS T* Lens Coating
-Compatible with vivo ZEISS 2.35x Telephoto Extender Lens
Quad Cameras:
200MP Main Camera (f/1.5 Aperture, Laser Autofocus, OIS)
200MP Periscope Telephoto (f/2.2 Aperture, Autofocus, OIS, 3x Optical Zoom)
50MP Periscope Telephoto (f/3.5 Aperture, Autofocus, OIS, 10x Optical Zoom)
50MP Ultrawide (f/2.0 Aperture, Autofocus, 123˚ FoV)
-Dual LED Flash
-Up to 8K@30fps/4K@120fps video recording, EIS/OIS video stabilization, Dolby Vision
Color spectrum sensor
Hasselblad Natural Colour
Front Camera 50 Megapixels (Samsung JN1, f/2.0 Aperture, Autofocus)
- Up to 4K@60fps video recording
50 Megapixels (f/2.4 Aperture, Autofocus)
- Up to 4K@60fps video recording
Storage 512GB (UFS 4.1) 512GB (UFS 4.1)
Expansion None None
SIM Dual SIM (Nano + Nano with eSIM support) Dual SIM (Nano + Nano with eSIM support)
Networks 5G, 4G LTE (with VoLTE), 3G HSPA+, 2G EDGE & GPRS Networks 5G, 4G LTE (with VoLTE), 3G HSPA+, 2G EDGE & GPRS Networks
Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac/6/7 Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac/6/7
NFC Yes Yes
Bluetooth Bluetooth 6.0 Bluetooth 6.0
Infrared Yes Yes
Position GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC
USB OTG Yes (USB 3.2) Yes, USB 3.2 Gen 1
USB USB Type-C USB Type-C
3.5mm Audio Jack No No
Audio Enhancement Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers Stereo Dual Speakers (symmetrical)
FM Radio No No
Sensors Face Recognition & Fingerprint Sensor
Proximity Sensor & Ambient Light Sensor
Compass, Gyroscope & Accelerometer
Face Recognition & Fingerprint Sensor
Proximity Sensor & Ambient Light Sensor
Compass, Gyroscope & Accelerometer
Battery 6510 mAh Si/C Battery (Non-removable)
90W Fast Charging (vivo FlashCharge)
40W Wireless Charging
7050 mAh Si/C Battery (Non-removable)
100W Fast Charging (SUPERVOOC)
50W Wireless Charging (AIRVOOC)
Material Glass front and back with Aluminum alloy frame (IP68/IP69 dust & water resistance) Glass front, Eco Leather back, Aluminum frame (IP69/IP69 dust & water resistance)
Size 161.98 x 75.48 x 7.99 mm 163.16 x 76.97 x 9.10 mm
Weight 226 g 236 g
Colors Dune Brown Tundra Umber, Canyon Orange
Release Date November 26, 2025 April 24, 2026
Price 77,999.00 - Official Price in the Philippines 99,999.00 - Official Price in the Philippines
Buy Online vivo X300 Pro on Lazada
vivo X300 Pro on Shopee
OPPO Find X9 Ultra on Lazada
OPPO Find X9 Ultra on Shopee




vs





Suggested comparisons: