vivo X300 Pro vs SAMSUNG Galaxy Z Flip8: Side by Side Specs Comparison

This is a side-by-side smartphone specs comparison of the vivo X300 Pro and SAMSUNG Galaxy Z Flip8.

The vivo X300 Pro has a 6.78-inch display, MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (3 nm) processor, triple cameras, 5G connectivity, and 6510mAh battery.

Meanwhile, the SAMSUNG Galaxy Z Flip8 has a 6.9-inch display, Exynos 2600 (2 nm) processor, dual cameras, 5G connectivity, and 4300mAh battery.

Specs vivo X300 Pro SAMSUNG Galaxy Z Flip8
Picture vivo X300 Pro
3.7/5 stars (14 ratings)
× SAMSUNG Galaxy Z Flip8
4/5 stars (1 ratings)
Screen 6.78-inch FHD+ LTPO AMOLED Display (1260 x 2800 Pixels 452 ppi) with Armor Glass, 1-120Hz Adaptive Refresh Rate, 4500nits peak brightness, Dolby Vision, HDR10+ and punch-hole 6.9-inch Foldable FHD+ Dynamic AMOLED 2X Main Display (1080 x 2520 Pixels, 400 ppi) with 120Hz Refresh Rate, LTPO, 3000nits peak brightness, HDR10+ and punch-hole
4.1-inch HD+ Super AMOLED Cover Display 948 x 1048 Pixels, 342 ppi) with Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, 120Hz Refresh Rate, 3000nits peak brightness, and punch-holes for the rear camera system
OS Android 16 with OriginOS 6 Android 17 with One UI 9; up to 7 major OS updates
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9500 (3 nm) Exynos 2600 (2 nm)
CPU Octa Core CPU
1x C1-Ultra @ 4.21GHz , 3x C1-Premium @ 3.5GHz & 4x C1-Pro @ 2.7GHz
Deca Core CPU
1x C1-Ultra @ 3.8GHz , 3x C1-Pro @ 3.25GHz & 6x C1-Pro @ 2.75GHz
GPU Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 Xclipse 960
RAM 16 GB 12 GB
Rear Camera Triple Cameras:
50MP Main Camera (Sony LYT-828, f/1.57 Aperture, Laser Autofocus, OIS)
50MP Ultrawide (f/2.0 Aperture, 119˚ FoV, Autofocus)
200MP Periscope Telephoto (Apochromatic, f/2.67 Aperture, Autofocus, 3.7x Optical zoom, OIS)
-Triple LED Flash
-Up to 8K@30fps or 4K@120fps video recording, OIS/EIS video stabilization, Dolby Vision, 10-bit Log, Color Spectrum Sensor, ZEISS Optics, ZIESS T* Lens Coating
-Compatible with vivo ZEISS 2.35x Telephoto Extender Lens
Dual Cameras:
50MP Main Camera (f/1.8 Aperture, Autofocus, OIS)
12MP Ultrawide (f/2.2 aperture, 123° FoV)
-LED Flash
-Up to 4K@60fps video recording
Front Camera 50 Megapixels (Samsung JN1, f/2.0 Aperture, Autofocus)
- Up to 4K@60fps video recording
10 Megapixels (f/2.2 Aperture)
- Up to 4K@60fps video recording
Storage 512GB (UFS 4.1) 256GB or 512GB
Expansion None None
SIM Dual SIM (Nano + Nano with eSIM support) Dual SIM (Nano + Nano with eSIM support)
Networks 5G, 4G LTE (with VoLTE), 3G HSPA+, 2G EDGE & GPRS Networks 5G, 4G LTE (with VoLTE), 3G HSPA+, 2G EDGE & GPRS Networks
Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac/6/7 Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac/6/7
NFC Yes Yes
Bluetooth Bluetooth 6.0 Bluetooth 5.4
Infrared Yes
Position GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BeiDou, QZSS
USB OTG Yes (USB 3.2) Yes with Samsung DeX (desktop experience)
USB USB Type-C USB Type-C
3.5mm Audio Jack No No
Audio Enhancement Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers Stereo Speakers
FM Radio No
Sensors Face Recognition & Fingerprint Sensor
Proximity Sensor & Ambient Light Sensor
Compass, Gyroscope & Accelerometer
Face Recognition & Fingerprint Sensor
Barometer, Proximity Sensor & Ambient Light Sensor
Compass, Gyroscope & Accelerometer
Battery 6510 mAh Si/C Battery (Non-removable)
90W Fast Charging (vivo FlashCharge)
40W Wireless Charging
4300 mAh Li-ion Battery (Non-removable)
25W Charging rate (55% in 30 minutes)
15W Wireless charging
Material Glass front and back with Aluminum alloy frame (IP68/IP69 dust & water resistance) Glass back, Plastic main screen, Aluminum frame (IP48 dust & water resistance)
Size 161.98 x 75.48 x 7.99 mm 166.9 x 75.4 x 6.1 mm (unfolded) or 85.7 x 75.4 x 13.1 (unfolded)
Weight 226 g 180 g
Colors Dune Brown Graphite, Cream, Pink, Mint
Release Date November 26, 2025 July 22, 2026
Price 77,999.00 - Official Price in the Philippines 77,990.00 - Official price of 12GB+256GB version in the Philippines
91,990.00 - Official price of 12GB+512GB version in the Philippines
Buy Online vivo X300 Pro on Lazada
vivo X300 Pro on Shopee
SAMSUNG Galaxy Z Flip8 on Lazada
SAMSUNG Galaxy Z Flip8 on Shopee




vs





Suggested comparisons: