Xiaomi 17 Ultra vs OPPO Find X9 Ultra: Side by Side Specs Comparison

This is a side-by-side smartphone specs comparison of the Xiaomi 17 Ultra and OPPO Find X9 Ultra.

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra has a 6.9-inch display, Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) processor, triple cameras, 5G connectivity, and 6000mAh battery.

Meanwhile, the OPPO Find X9 Ultra has a 6.82-inch display, Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) processor, quad cameras, 5G connectivity, and 7050mAh battery.

Specs Xiaomi 17 Ultra OPPO Find X9 Ultra
Picture Xiaomi 17 Ultra
4.6/5 stars (10 ratings)
× OPPO Find X9 Ultra
3.7/5 stars (15 ratings)
Screen 6.9-inch AMOLED Display (1200 x 2608 Pixels 416 ppi) with Xiaomi Shield Glass, LTPO 120Hz Refresh Rate, 3500nits peak brightness, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, and punch-hole 6.82-inch QHD+ AMOLED Display (1440 x 3168 Pixels, 510 ppi) with Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, 1-144Hz Refresh Rate, 1-800nits typical brightness, 3600nits peak, Dolby Vision, and punch-hole
OS Android 16 with Xiaomi HyperOS 3 Android 16 with ColorOS 16.0
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm)
CPU Octa Core CPU
2x Oryon Gen 3 Prime @ 4.61GHz & 6x Oryon Gen 3 Performance @ 3.63GHz
Octa Core CPU
2x Oryon Gen 3 Prime @ 4.61GHz & 6x Oryon Gen 3 Performance @ 3.63GHz
GPU Adreno 840 Adreno 840
RAM 16 GB 12 GB
Rear Camera Triple Cameras:
50MP Main Camera (f/1.7 Aperture, Autofocus, OIS)
200MP Periscope Telephoto (f/2.4~3.0 Aperture, Autofocus, OIS, 3.2x~4.3x Optical Zoom)
50MP Ultrawide (f/2.2 Aperture, Autofocus, 115˚ FoV)
TOF 3D Depth sensor
-Dual LED Flash
-Up to 8K@30fps video recording, Laser Autofocus, LEICA Optics, OIS/EIS video stabilization
Quad Cameras:
200MP Main Camera (f/1.5 Aperture, Laser Autofocus, OIS)
200MP Periscope Telephoto (f/2.2 Aperture, Autofocus, OIS, 3x Optical Zoom)
50MP Periscope Telephoto (f/3.5 Aperture, Autofocus, OIS, 10x Optical Zoom)
50MP Ultrawide (f/2.0 Aperture, Autofocus, 123˚ FoV)
-Dual LED Flash
-Up to 8K@30fps/4K@120fps video recording, EIS/OIS video stabilization, Dolby Vision
Color spectrum sensor
Hasselblad Natural Colour
Front Camera 50 Megapixels (f/2.2 Aperture)
- Up to 4K@60fps video recording, video stabilization
50 Megapixels (f/2.4 Aperture, Autofocus)
- Up to 4K@60fps video recording
Storage 512GB 512GB (UFS 4.1)
Expansion None None
SIM Dual SIM (Nano + Nano with eSIM support) Dual SIM (Nano + Nano with eSIM support)
Networks 5G, 4G LTE (with VoLTE), 3G HSPA+, 2G EDGE & GPRS Networks 5G, 4G LTE (with VoLTE), 3G HSPA+, 2G EDGE & GPRS Networks
Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac/6/7 Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac/6/7
NFC Yes Yes
Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.4 Bluetooth 6.0
Infrared Yes Yes
Position GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BeiDou, QZSS, NavIC
USB OTG Yes (USB 3.2 Gen 2 with DisplayPort) Yes, USB 3.2 Gen 1
USB USB Type-C USB Type-C
3.5mm Audio Jack No No
Audio Enhancement Hi-Res Audio, Hi-Res Wireless Audio, Stereo Dual Speakers Stereo Dual Speakers (symmetrical)
FM Radio No No
Sensors Face Recognition & Fingerprint Sensor
Barometer, Proximity Sensor & Ambient Light Sensor
Compass, Gyroscope & Accelerometer
Face Recognition & Fingerprint Sensor
Proximity Sensor & Ambient Light Sensor
Compass, Gyroscope & Accelerometer
Battery 6000 mAh Si/C Battery (Non-removable)
90W Fast Charging
50W Wireless Charging
22.5W Reverse Charging
10W Reverse Wireless Charging
7050 mAh Si/C Battery (Non-removable)
100W Fast Charging (SUPERVOOC)
50W Wireless Charging (AIRVOOC)
Material Glass front, Polycarbonate or Eco-leather back, Aluminum alloy frame (IP68/IP69 dust & water resistance) Glass front, Eco Leather back, Aluminum frame (IP69/IP69 dust & water resistance)
Size 162.9 x 77.6 x 8.29 mm 163.16 x 76.97 x 9.10 mm
Weight 224 g 236 g
Colors Starlit Green Tundra Umber, Canyon Orange
Release Date February 28, 2026 April 24, 2026
Price 99,999.00 - Official Price in the Philippines 99,999.00 - Official Price in the Philippines
Buy Online Xiaomi 17 Ultra on Lazada
Xiaomi 17 Ultra on Shopee
OPPO Find X9 Ultra on Lazada
OPPO Find X9 Ultra on Shopee




vs





Suggested comparisons: