SAMSUNG Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra vs Redmi 15C: Side by Side Specs Comparison

This is a side-by-side smartphone specs comparison of the SAMSUNG Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra and Redmi 15C.

The SAMSUNG Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has a 8-inch display, Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) processor, triple cameras, 5G connectivity, and 5000mAh battery.

Meanwhile, the Redmi 15C has a 6.9-inch display, MediaTek Helio G81-Ultra (12 nm) processor, dual cameras, 4G LTE connectivity, and 6000mAh battery.

Specs SAMSUNG Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra Redmi 15C
Picture SAMSUNG Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
3.5/5 stars ( ratings)
× Redmi 15C
3.3/5 stars (47 ratings)
Screen 8-inch Foldable QXGA+ Dynamic AMOLED 2X Main Display (2256 x 2504 Pixels 421 ppi) with 120Hz Refresh Rate, LTPO, 3000nits peak brightness, HDR10+, Anti-glare, Flex Titanium layer and punch-hole
6.5-inch FHD+ Dynamic AMOLED 2X Cover Display (1080 x 2520 Pixels, 422 ppi) with Corning Gorilla Glass Ceramic 3, 120Hz Refresh Rate, LTPO and punch-hole
6.9-inch HD+ IPS LCD Display (720 x 1600 Pixels, 254 ppi) with Corning Gorilla Glass 3, 20:9 Aspect Ratio, 120Hz Refresh Rate and notch
OS Android 17 with One UI 9; up to 7 major OS updates Android 15 with HyperOS 2
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) MediaTek Helio G81-Ultra (12 nm)
CPU Octa Core CPU
2x Oryon V3 Phoenix L @ 4.74GHz & 6x Oryon V3 Phoenix M @ 3.62GHz
Octa Core CPU
2x Cortex-A75 @ 2.0GHz & 6x Cortex-A55 @ 1.8GHz
GPU Adreno 840 Mali-G52 MC2
RAM 12GB or 16GB of RAM 4GB, 6GB or 8GB of RAM
Rear Camera Triple Cameras:
200MP Main Camera (f/1.7 Aperture, Autofocus, OIS)
50MP Ultrawide (f/1.9 Aperture, Autofocus, 120° FoV)
10MP Telephoto (f/2.4 Aperture, Autofocus, OIS, 3x Optical Zoom)
-LED Flash
-Up to 8K@30fps video recording, OIS/EIS video stabilization
Dual Cameras:
50MP Main Camera (f/1.8 Aperture, Autofocus)
Auxiliary lens
-LED Flash
-Up to 1080p video recording
Front Camera Multiple Cameras:
10MP Main selfie camera (f/2.2 Aperture)
10MP Cover selfie camera (f/2.2 Aperture)

-Up to 4K@60fps video recording
8 Megapixels (f/2.0 Aperture)
- Up to 1080p video recording
Storage 256GB, 512GB or 1TB 128GB or 256GB
Expansion None 1TB via microSD
SIM Dual SIM (Nano + Nano with eSIM support) Dual SIM (Nano-SIM)
Networks 5G, 4G LTE (with VoLTE), 3G HSPA+, 2G EDGE & GPRS Networks 4G LTE, 3G HSPA+, 2G EDGE & GPRS Networks
Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac/6/7 Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac (dual band)
NFC Yes Yes
Bluetooth Bluetooth 6.0 Bluetooth 5.4
Infrared
Position GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BeiDou, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BeiDou
USB OTG Yes with Samsung DeX (desktop experience) Yes
USB USB Type-C USB Type-C
3.5mm Audio Jack No Yes
Audio Enhancement Stereo Speakers Up to 200% speaker volume
FM Radio No Yes
Sensors Face Recognition & Fingerprint Sensor
Barometer, Proximity Sensor & Ambient Light Sensor
Compass, Gyroscope & Accelerometer
Ultrawide Band (UWB)
Face Recognition & Fingerprint Sensor
Proximity Sensor
Compass & Accelerometer
Battery 5000 mAh (Non-removable)
45W Fast charging (67% in 30 minutes)
20W Wireless charging
6000 mAh (Non-removable)
33W Fast Charging (50% in 31 minutes)
Material Glass back and cover screen, Plastic inner screen, Aluminum frame (IP48 dust & water resistance) Glass front and back (IP64 dust & splash resistance)
Size 158.4 x 143.2 x 4.1 mm (unfolded) or 158.4 x 72.8 x 8.9 mm (folded) 171.56 x 79.47 x 7.99 mm
Weight 215 g 205 g
Colors Graphite, Cream, Violet Shadow, Green Shadow Midnight Black, Moonlight Blue, Mint Green, Twilight Orange
Release Date July 22, 2026 September 11, 2025
Price 123,990.00 - Official price of 12GB+256GB version in the Philippines
137,990.00 - Official price of 12GB+512GB version in the Philippines
165,990.00 - Official price of 16GB+1TB version in the Philippines
5,299.00 - Official price of 4GB+128GB version in the Philippines
5,799.00 - Official price of 6GB+128GB version in the Philippines
6,599.00 - Official price of 8GB+256GB version in the Philippines
Buy Online SAMSUNG Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra on Lazada
SAMSUNG Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra on Shopee
Redmi 15C on Lazada
Redmi 15C on Shopee




vs





Suggested comparisons: