SAMSUNG Galaxy Z Fold7 vs Redmi 15C: Side by Side Specs Comparison

This is a side-by-side smartphone specs comparison of the SAMSUNG Galaxy Z Fold7 and Redmi 15C.

The SAMSUNG Galaxy Z Fold7 has a 8.0-inch display, Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) processor, triple cameras, 5G connectivity, and 4400mAh battery.

Meanwhile, the Redmi 15C has a 6.9-inch display, MediaTek Helio G81-Ultra (12 nm) processor, dual cameras, 4G LTE connectivity, and 6000mAh battery.

Specs SAMSUNG Galaxy Z Fold7 Redmi 15C
Picture SAMSUNG Galaxy Z Fold7
3.6/5 stars (6 ratings)
× Redmi 15C
3.3/5 stars (47 ratings)
Screen 8.0-inch Foldable QXGA+ Dynamic AMOLED 2X Main Display (1968 x 2184 Pixels 368 ppi) with Ultra Thin Glass, 120Hz Refresh Rate, 2600nits peak, HDR10+ and punch-hole
6.5-inch FHD+ Dynamic AMOLED 2X Cover Display (1080 x 2520 Pixels, 422 ppi) with Corning Gorilla Glass Ceramic 2, 21:9 Aspect Ratio, 120Hz Refresh Rate and punch-hole
6.9-inch HD+ IPS LCD Display (720 x 1600 Pixels, 254 ppi) with Corning Gorilla Glass 3, 20:9 Aspect Ratio, 120Hz Refresh Rate and notch
OS Android 16 with One UI 8 (up to 7 major OS upgrades) Android 15 with HyperOS 2
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) MediaTek Helio G81-Ultra (12 nm)
CPU Octa Core CPU
2x Oryon V2 Phoenix L @ 4.47GHz & 6x Oryon V2 Phoenix M @ 3.53GHz
Octa Core CPU
2x Cortex-A75 @ 2.0GHz & 6x Cortex-A55 @ 1.8GHz
GPU Adreno 830 Mali-G52 MC2
RAM 12GB or 16GB of RAM 4GB, 6GB or 8GB of RAM
Rear Camera Triple Cameras:
200MP Main Camera (f/1.7 Aperture, Autofocus, OIS)
12MP Ultrawide (f/2.2 Aperture, Autofocus)
10MP Telephoto (f/2.4 Aperture, Autofocus, OIS, 3x Optical Zoom)
-LED Flash
-Up to 8K video recording, OIS+EIS video stabilization, HDR10+
Dual Cameras:
50MP Main Camera (f/1.8 Aperture, Autofocus)
Auxiliary lens
-LED Flash
-Up to 1080p video recording
Front Camera Multiple Cameras:
10MP Inner Selfie Camera (f/2.2 Aperture)
10MP Cover Camera (f/2.2 Aperture)

-Up to 4K@60fps video recording, EIS video stabilization
8 Megapixels (f/2.0 Aperture)
- Up to 1080p video recording
Storage 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 128GB or 256GB
Expansion None 1TB via microSD
SIM Dual SIM (Nano + Nano with eSIM support) Dual SIM (Nano-SIM)
Networks 5G, 4G LTE (with VoLTE), 3G HSPA+, 2G EDGE & GPRS Networks 4G LTE, 3G HSPA+, 2G EDGE & GPRS Networks
Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac/6/7 Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac (dual band)
NFC Yes Yes
Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.4 Bluetooth 5.4
Infrared
Position GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BeiDou, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BeiDou
USB OTG Yes with Samsung DeX Desktop Experience Yes
USB USB Type-C USB Type-C
3.5mm Audio Jack No Yes
Audio Enhancement Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers tuned by AKG Up to 200% speaker volume
FM Radio Yes
Sensors Face Recognition & Fingerprint Sensor
Barometer, Proximity Sensor & Ambient Light Sensor
Compass, Gyroscope & Accelerometer
Ultra Wideband (UWB)
Face Recognition & Fingerprint Sensor
Proximity Sensor
Compass & Accelerometer
Battery 4400 mAh Li-Po Battery (Non-removable)
25W Fast Charging (50% in 30 minutes) 15W Wireless Charging
6000 mAh (Non-removable)
33W Fast Charging (50% in 31 minutes)
Material Glass front, Glass back, Aluminum frame and UTG (plastic) inner display with Titanium Lattice (IP48 dust & water resistance) Glass front and back (IP64 dust & splash resistance)
Size 158.4 x 143.2 x 4.2 mm (unfolded) or 158.4 x 72.8 x 8.9 mm (folded) 171.56 x 79.47 x 7.99 mm
Weight 215 g 205 g
Colors Jetblack, Silver Shadow, Blue Shadow, Mint Midnight Black, Moonlight Blue, Mint Green, Twilight Orange
Release Date July 10, 2025 September 11, 2025
Price 112,990.00 - Official price of 12GB+256GB version in the Philippines
120,990.00 - Official price of 12GB+512GB version in the Philippines
141,990.00 - Official price of 16GB+1TB version in the Philippines
5,299.00 - Official price of 4GB+128GB version in the Philippines
5,799.00 - Official price of 6GB+128GB version in the Philippines
6,599.00 - Official price of 8GB+256GB version in the Philippines
Buy Online SAMSUNG Galaxy Z Fold7 on Lazada
SAMSUNG Galaxy Z Fold7 on Shopee
Redmi 15C on Lazada
Redmi 15C on Shopee




vs





Suggested comparisons: