vivo X70 vs SAMSUNG Galaxy Z Fold7: Side by Side Specs Comparison

This is a side-by-side smartphone specs comparison of the vivo X70 and SAMSUNG Galaxy Z Fold7.

The vivo X70 has a 6.56-inch display, MediaTek Dimensity 1200 processor, triple cameras, 5G connectivity, and 4400mAh battery.

Meanwhile, the SAMSUNG Galaxy Z Fold7 has a 8.0-inch display, Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) processor, triple cameras, 5G connectivity, and 4400mAh battery.

Specs vivo X70 SAMSUNG Galaxy Z Fold7
Picture vivo X70
3.2/5 stars (120 ratings)
× SAMSUNG Galaxy Z Fold7
3.6/5 stars (6 ratings)
Screen 6.56-inch FHD+ AMOLED Display (1080 x 2376 Pixels 398 ppi) with 19.8:9 Aspect Ratio, 120Hz Refresh Rate, HDR10+, and punch-hole 8.0-inch Foldable QXGA+ Dynamic AMOLED 2X Main Display (1968 x 2184 Pixels, 368 ppi) with Ultra Thin Glass, 120Hz Refresh Rate, 2600nits peak, HDR10+ and punch-hole
6.5-inch FHD+ Dynamic AMOLED 2X Cover Display (1080 x 2520 Pixels, 422 ppi) with Corning Gorilla Glass Ceramic 2, 21:9 Aspect Ratio, 120Hz Refresh Rate and punch-hole
OS Android 11 with Funtouch OS 12 Android 16 with One UI 8 (up to 7 major OS upgrades)
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 1200 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm)
CPU Octa Core CPU
1x Cortex-A78 @ 3.0GHz , 3x Cortex-A78 @ 2.6GHz & 4x Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz
Octa Core CPU
2x Oryon V2 Phoenix L @ 4.47GHz & 6x Oryon V2 Phoenix M @ 3.53GHz
GPU Mali-G77 MC9 Adreno 830
RAM 12 GB 12GB or 16GB of RAM
Rear Camera Triple Cameras:
40MP Main Camera (f/1.89 Aperture, Laser Autofocus, EIS)
12MP Telephoto (f/1.98 Aperture, Autofocus, 2x Optical Zoom)
12MP Ultra-wide (f/2.2 Aperture, 116˚ FoV)
-Dual-tone LED Flash
-Up to 4K@60fps Video Recording, 5-Axis Video Stabilization, Gimbal 3.0, ZEISS Optics, and ZEISS T* Lens Coating
Triple Cameras:
200MP Main Camera (f/1.7 Aperture, Autofocus, OIS)
12MP Ultrawide (f/2.2 Aperture, Autofocus)
10MP Telephoto (f/2.4 Aperture, Autofocus, OIS, 3x Optical Zoom)
-LED Flash
-Up to 8K video recording, OIS+EIS video stabilization, HDR10+
Front Camera 32 Megapixels (f/2.45 Aperture)
- Up to 4K@60fps Video Recording
Multiple Cameras:
10MP Inner Selfie Camera (f/2.2 Aperture)
10MP Cover Camera (f/2.2 Aperture)

-Up to 4K@60fps video recording, EIS video stabilization
Storage 256GB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB
Expansion None None
SIM Dual SIM (Nano-SIM) Dual SIM (Nano + Nano with eSIM support)
Networks 5G, 4G LTE (with VoLTE), 3G HSPA+, 2G EDGE & GPRS Networks 5G, 4G LTE (with VoLTE), 3G HSPA+, 2G EDGE & GPRS Networks
Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 6 Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac/6/7
NFC Yes Yes
Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.2 Bluetooth 5.4
Infrared Yes
Position GPS with A-GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BeiDou, QZSS, and NavIC GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BeiDou, QZSS
USB OTG Yes Yes with Samsung DeX Desktop Experience
USB USB Type-C USB Type-C
3.5mm Audio Jack No No
Audio Enhancement Hi-Res Audio Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers tuned by AKG
FM Radio No
Sensors Face Recognition & Fingerprint Sensor
Proximity Sensor & Ambient Light Sensor
Compass, Gyroscope & Accelerometer
Face Recognition & Fingerprint Sensor
Barometer, Proximity Sensor & Ambient Light Sensor
Compass, Gyroscope & Accelerometer
Ultra Wideband (UWB)
Battery 4400 mAh Li-Po Battery (Non-removable)
44W Fast Charging (FlashCharge)
4400 mAh Li-Po Battery (Non-removable)
25W Fast Charging (50% in 30 minutes) 15W Wireless Charging
Material Glass Front and Back Glass front, Glass back, Aluminum frame and UTG (plastic) inner display with Titanium Lattice (IP48 dust & water resistance)
Size 160.10 x 75.39 x 7.55 mm 158.4 x 143.2 x 4.2 mm (unfolded) or 158.4 x 72.8 x 8.9 mm (folded)
Weight 181 g 215 g
Colors Cosmic Black and Aurora Dawn Jetblack, Silver Shadow, Blue Shadow, Mint
Release Date October 8, 2021 July 10, 2025
Price 34,999.00 - Official Price in the Philippines 112,990.00 - Official price of 12GB+256GB version in the Philippines
120,990.00 - Official price of 12GB+512GB version in the Philippines
141,990.00 - Official price of 16GB+1TB version in the Philippines
Buy Online vivo X70 on Lazada
vivo X70 on Shopee
SAMSUNG Galaxy Z Fold7 on Lazada
SAMSUNG Galaxy Z Fold7 on Shopee




vs





Suggested comparisons: