This is a side-by-side specs comparison of the Nokia 3.1 and OPPO A52 smartphones.
The Nokia 3.1 features a more compact 5.2-inch display, 2,990mAh battery and MediaTek MT6750 chipset.
Meanwhile, the OPPO A52 features a larger 6.5-inch display, 5,000mAh battery, 18W charging rate, quad-camera setup and Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset. It is more expensive.
| Specs | Nokia 3.1 | OPPO A52 |
|---|---|---|
| Picture & Ratings |
★★★★★ 3.6/5 stars (15)
|
×
★★★★★ 3.6/5 stars (236)
|
|
|
||
| Design and Display | ||
| Display | 5.2-inch HD+ IPS LCD Display (720 x 1440 Pixels 310 ppi) with Corning Gorilla Glass, 18:9 Aspect Ratio and 2.5D Arc Glass | 6.5-inch FHD+ IPS LCD Display (1080 x 2400 Pixels, 405 ppi) with Scratch Resistant Glass, 20:9 Aspect Ratio and Punch-hole |
| Size | 146.3 x 68.7 x 8.7 mm | 162.0 × 75.5 × 8.9 mm |
| Weight | 138 g | 192 g |
| Build | Polycarbonate with Metal Frame | Glossy Plastic |
| Durability | ||
| Colors | Blue, Black and White | Black and Blue |
| Our pick: |
✔
OPPO A52 The OPPO A52 has a larger and sharper display. |
|
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | MediaTek MT6750 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 |
| CPU | Octa Core CPU 8x Cortex-A53 @ 1.5GHz |
Octa Core CPU 4x Kryo 260 Gold @ 2.0GHz & 4x Kryo 260 Silver @ 1.8GHz |
| GPU | Mali-T860 | Adreno 610 |
| RAM | 3 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage | 32GB | 128GB |
| Expansion | 128GB via microSD | 256GB via microSD |
| OS | Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 with ColorOS 7 |
| Our pick: |
✔
OPPO A52
The OPPO A52 has better performance and a higher RAM capacity. |
|
| Cameras | ||
| Rear Camera | 13 Megapixels (f/2.0 Aperture) Autofocus LED Flash |
Quad Cameras: 12MP Main Camera (f/1.8 Aperture, Autofocus) 8MP Ultra-wide (f/2.2 Aperture, 119° FOV) 2MP Macro (f/2.4 Aperture) 2MP Depth Sensor -LED Flash -4K Video Recording |
| Front Camera |
8 Megapixels (f/2.0 Aperture) with Fixed Focus |
8 Megapixels (f/2.0 Aperture) |
| Our pick: |
✔
OPPO A52
OPPO A52 has the more capable camera system with a wider 119° ultrawide camera. |
|
| Connectivity | ||
| Networks | 4G LTE, 3G HSPA+, 2G EDGE & GPRS Networks | 4G LTE (with VoLTE), 3G HSPA+, 2G EDGE & GPRS Networks |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac (Dual Band) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM) | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM) |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| Infrared | ||
| Location | A-GPS | A-GPS, GLONASS & BeiDou |
| Our pick: |
Tie
Both phones offer similar connectivity. |
|
| Audio and Features | ||
| USB OTG | Yes | Yes |
| USB | MicroUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| 3.5mm Audio Jack | Yes | Yes |
| Audio Enhancement | None | Dirac 2.0 |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Sensors |
Fingerprint Sensor Proximity Sensor & Ambient Light Sensor Compass, Gyroscope & Accelerometer |
Face Recognition & Fingerprint Sensor Proximity Sensor & Ambient Light Sensor Compass, Gyroscope & Accelerometer |
| Our pick: |
✔
OPPO A52
Based on the specs, it has Dirac audio tuning and face recognition. |
|
| Battery and Charging | ||
| Battery | 2990 mAh Li-ion Battery (Non-removable) | 5000 mAh Li-Po Battery (Non-removable) |
| Charging |
5V/2A Charging |
18W Fast Charging |
| Our pick: |
✔
OPPO A52
The OPPO A52 has a larger battery capacity and faster charging. |
|
|
|
||
| Price and Availability | ||
| Price | ₱9,990.00 - Official Price in the Philippines | ₱11,990.00 - Official Price in the Philippines |
| Release Date | May 30, 2018 | June 25, 2020 |
| Buy Online |
|
|
